Home | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use                

Health Care Reform: The Hank Factor

Posted by in Sunday, February 19th 2012
Tags: , , , ,

In which John, who is kind of a fiscal conservative, uses the example of Hank to show how the current American health care system disincentivizes economic growth and entrepreneurship and argues that a public insurance option (even like the hodgepodge one in Montana) does not result in public bankruptcy but a more efficient and productive economy. Our community lives at www.nerdfighters.com

Video Rating: 4 / 5

Comments
MarzProductionCo Said:

Original brony there


rosalena46 Said:

Don’t diss the Brony.


Slapbass13 Said:

1) ‘This isn’t because insurance companies are evil or anything, they just don’t see Hank as a good investment.’ Yes. And therefore they are evil. Stop making excuses for corporations just because you are so fixated on capital.
2) Actually the government should give people everything they need. A means of living and wellbeing should be key to citizenship.


musechick101 Said:

John, I congratulate you on the ability to mess with your brother with the MLP obsession as a child. Good job on being a semi-annoying big brother! I know I’ve done my job with my little brother, mwahaha


PykohYT Said:

So who the eff IS hank?
He’s the engine that drives economic and job growth in America.


piglatin123 Said:

I learn more from John Green than I do from half my classes in school.


EmberMaye Said:

While this is an old video, I have to point out: even people who are poor can’t always get Medicaid. Nowadays they have giant wait lists and many people sit for years uninsured on said wait lists. Just a little tidbit.


MrWundrful Said:

@MsIdontmakevideos trust me these things in which have mentioned are all mainly power grabs by our more liberal government.


sandstormxx Said:

See, my mum had really bad stomach aches for a while. And was quite thin. Eventually her aches got so bad she needed to be taken to the hospital, and turns out she was a coeliac. My brother had bad pains near his kidneys and was given medication. I just don’t see why you would pay for that.


stu10leadhead Said:

@sileb13 Surely the fact that as an American in the UK, you still have the same rights and healthcare available to you as a British citizen. The NHS is by no means perfect, but how many things that are over 60 years old are? The point is we need to improve on it, not just say “It’s broke! Next plan please!”


thespianwaffles Said:

Hank was a brony before the rest of us.


Caprinae Said:

sileb13 Said:

@MsIdontmakevideos The NHS does not rock — I am a US citizen living here in the UK and the quality of the healthcare over here definitely inferior to that of the United States.
That said, I fully advocate socialized healthcare because the potential drop in quality is mostly irrelevant… The point is that a person’s wealth should not determine whether or not they are allowed to receive care; care that is, in many cases, essential to their pursuit of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.


TheInspirationExpert Said:

Hee hee hee, John! The fact remains, they were YOUR little ponies.


finbob83 Said:

It should have been called “EcoGeeko”


thereinliestherib Said:

@caprafan Total, absolute bullshit. I’ve been poor my whole life, which has made me healthier because of work and because of the fact that nutritional foods is CHEAPER than junk, both in terms of quality and quantity. Your argument is total garbage without any facts. Your argument is the industry’s argument, so they can get more money, more consumer leverage, and more power, when personal health is directly tied to personal choice, plain and simple.


FlargTheKitty Said:

@MsIdontmakevideos aqwesrftyguhi you have no idea how much I wish American Congress would listen to your arguement, and do the logical thing!!


caprafan Said:

@thereinliestherib Here’s the rub: In our system, there is a direct correlation between wealth and health, because care is so expensive, as well as other health-promoting things like nutritious food, belonging to a gym, etc. We need to do a better job of preventative, primary care, which will reduce the cost burden of disease complications. In other words, it’s a lot cheaper to help grandma take care of herself than to wait till she winds up in the hospital; it’s also better for grandma.


PeaceGeek316 Said:

@MsIdontmakevideos As an American who wants the British system, thank you so much! Socialism needs to be less of a scary conservative buzzword and more of a real thing that people should understand and hold complex opinions on.


TheSelfishAltruist Said:

@thereinliestherib No! you pay more for healthcare, because the system is so inefficient and does not actually make you healthy, it means you are more likely to get chronic conditions, and therefore require expensive treatment. Don’t you see that the system is responsible for your health, so if your health is shit… its because the system failed. I think we disagree on a important principle here… I think the health system is responsible for your overall health, including how fat you are.


TheSelfishAltruist Said:

@thereinliestherib You’ve got it the wrong way around. The health system as a whole is responsible for overall public health, if the people are unhealthy its because the system is failing. We are healthier because our family doctor keeps on top of things, such as weight, smoking, hormones, immunisations etc… This is all a part of health. But even so, the UK is the fattest nation in Europe, and we still manage to provide 100% coverage for free, for half the price. Theres more to it then obesity


thereinliestherib Said:

@TheSelfishAltruist Actually, overall UK rates of poor health are just over half those of the US–your point? You pay less for healthcare because your country is healthier (though hardly as healthy as the rest of europe), not because of your “system”. Now compare your natl health/costs to Scandinavia–see a trend? I would actually support more socialized care in the US if the country was healthy. But here, you’re the exception if you can see your toes over your belly. It’s gross.


thereinliestherib Said:

@TheSelfishAltruist What a stupid statement–Europe pays less specifically because Europeans are healthier, which highlights my point. You are absurdly misled–preventative care is the INDUSTRY’s argument for increasing costs and spreading risk, rather than constraining it. No doctor is going to bang down your door, kick the cig out of your hand, and tell you to get off your fat butt. “Preventative care” is forcing people to take responsibility for themselves, not a fucking poster campaign.


TheSelfishAltruist Said:

@thereinliestherib No… that is wrong. Preventative care is cheaper, and is better for you, so this probably is a HUGE part of explaining why Europe pays less yet gets more. Because our doctors don’t care about profit. its all about whats best for the patient. if you sell health as a product, then you want your customers to be in your doors more, paying more, using all your equipment… this I believe simply explains the problem with the USA system. It doesnt care about preventing sisease


TheSelfishAltruist Said:

@thereinliestherib No…. you are not so unhealthy that you need to pay double the UK. These are the facts…a nd boy do they hit home obvious points. Im not here with an ideological agenda, I just want what works. The UK pays 8% and covers everybody for free. You pay 8% from gov, 8% from your pockets… 85% insured only, and you need to pay, meaning obviosuly the poor will miss out.

Our system is cheaper, fairer, and delivers better. We are a fat smoking country as well so thats not the issue


rabbifilms Said:

0:18 – 0:26 You can here the one Republican say to the other, “Ohhh…..”… “…He said we’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the insurance industry….” LOL. Chumps.


Whyiyawta Said:

The lowlife Republicans are all for free speech. BTW The bankers are lower than the insurance company’s.


MichiganManiac5594 Said:

@ArizonaYlcat Yes as a matter of fact our country was founded of constitutional Libertarian ideals. With small government and no socialist programs. The Federal government had very little power like it should. And those principles are what made America the world power it used to be. Once we started turning our back on it and spent too much, taxed too much and adopted socialist methods thats when our country started to slip into the condition it is in today.


ArizonaYlcat Said:

@MichiganManiac5594 And can you site anything where Libertaianism works?


kd1s Said:

Shame he’s no longer in congress.


MichiganManiac5594 Said:

imma make this plain and simple if you think that the problem is DEMOCRAT or REPUBLICAN you are the problem… They are both the same shit who are lobbied out by big business. We need to start electing Libertarians into office who actually ENDORSE our constitution and not ignore it. Democrats and Republicans are both shit


shotsky94 Said:

@246alive Obamacare is socialist. Government control of healthcare is socialist. Under the new law, a dozen or so unelected bureaucrats are to be in charge of “cost-cutting”. This is acknowledged to include whether life-saving procedures should be carried out,etc. Socialism is all about concentrating power. And that’s what Obamacare is all about. More power to the government and healthcare industry. Less power to the individual who should be allowed to make his own decisions.


shotsky94 Said:

@246alive Haha. The old libbie public schools—healthcare conflation. Public schools ought to be run by local school boards not federal bureaucrats unaccountable to the people they’re supposedly helping. So, if the question is do I dislike the current public school system. Hell yes!!! Watch the movie Waiting For Superman and see what unlimited federal interference has done to our educational system.


246alive Said:

@shotsky94 obama care is not socialist

you know whats a socialist idea “public education”

public education is free and funded by taxes to benifit the general pop

our country is made up of a mix of capitalism and socalism

commuinism is not socialism

are you against public schools??

socialist is anything that benifits the whole

comuinism is when the goverment controls everything for the people

obama put many things in the healthcare law to PROTECT INSURANCE COMPANIES

you shut the fuck up


73HNiNJ4 Said:

How about Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Mike Lee and a few others who are COMPLETELY not affected by ANY interest groups? Unlike most democrats who are cronies just like most republicans. The dems support the bologna wars and the bailouts and the fed and the carbon trading bill (would have been big $ for banks) and my understanding is that many parts of obamacare WERE WRITTEN BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. The fact is that BOTH parties are selling us out to the elites, and people need to wake up.


shotsky94 Said:

HAHAHAHAH………….Shut the fuck up you unemployed hasbeen…..We will defeat and overturn your socialist experiment “obamacare”…..We arent done yet…..

“Republicans owned by the insurance industry”
Which is more conciliatory(not the best word) towards the insurance industry. Mandating that every single individual buys health insurance from those “evil companies” or allowing Americans to buy health insurance from any state of their choice as proposed by the GOP…..Go figure!


123tindris Said:

wow the Republicans are dicks. Let em talk!


ihavealaundrymachine Said:

r5t6y12 Said:

@ 0:55 Who said “OOHHH”?

Was it the guy at the top of the podium?

It couldn’t have been AW, he was too far away from the microphone to be heard.


idealdistribution Said:

More like this please. An amazing fighter. Also a human being.


RoboSlater Said:

What’s important is we got rid of him.


RoboSlater Said:

@strokesonfilm Yeah, “energy”…


piusvapor Said:

Just cause someone is loud and obnoxious doesn’t mean they’re telling the truth; Check out wiener’s lying when he’s defending allegations of his perverted pics, similar to the vid huh???


xKiraKirinx Said:

All man have weakness. For Weiner, like Clinton, its women. But you can never deny the fact that, clinton left a better economy than Bush when he left the office. For Weiner, he is one of the most articulate, one of the main person who got 9/11 responder’s Bill pass.

Funny no one persecute Bush for his deliberate deception in the intelligence reports, his non-congressional approval of war in Iraq. This kind of acts deserves to be impeached more than any sexual harassment.


RealTime88 Said:

@TheBoxingCannabyte It was 50 before Obama came in and now it’s less but Obama WILL have to get the rest insured somehow which means re-election!! A second term means he can proceed with Progressive ideals.


RealTime88 Said:

@smoovsouljah I totally agree as does Keith Olbermann and others. He gave more of a damn about health care in America than many of his colleagues in Congress. I hope he finds his voice again.


smoovsouljah Said:

love this guy….he should have stayed in office


911sanitarium Said:

i think this guy should go back to sending females pictures of his cock because thats all he is good at.


TheBoxingCannabyte Said:

@JawsJaws, oh, well now that you said it in all caps you sure convinced me!


JawsJaws Said:

@TheBoxingCannabyte He’s a LIAR


Leave a Reply